Machine and Deep Learning Models for Stress Detection Using Multimodal Physiological Data

• Published in: IEEE access Vol. 13; p. 1
• Main Authors: Abdelfattah, Eman, Joshi, Shreehar, Tiwari, Shreekar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Piscataway IEEE 01.01.2025; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Artificial neural networks; Biological system modeling; Biomedical monitoring; Blood volume; Body temperature; Classification; Datasets; Decision trees; Deep learning; Electrocardiography; Feature extraction; Human factors; Machine learning; Neural Networks; Physiology; Psychological stress; Random forests; Recurrent neural networks; Stress Detection; Wrist
• ISSN: 2169-3536; 2169-3536
• DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3525459

Stress can disrupt daily activities and harm health if prolonged or severe. Early detection of mental stress, indicated by changes in bio-signals like thermal, electrical, and acoustic signals, can prevent related health issues. This study employs machine learning and deep learning techniques on multimodal dataset from wearable sensors, focusing on processed metrics for the three-axis acceleration (ACC), electrocardiogram (ECG), blood volume pulse (BVP), body temperature (TEMP), respiration (RESP), electromyogram (EMG), and electrodermal activity (EDA) from the 15 subjects in the WESAD dataset to effectively classify four different states - baseline, stress, amusement, and meditation. Seven traditional machine learning algorithms - Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naïve Bayes Classifier, AdaBoost Classifier, XGB Classifier, Decision Trees Classifier, Extra Trees Classifier, and Random Forest Classifier and three widely used deep learning algorithms - Deep Neural Network, Convolutional Neural Network and Recurrent Neural Network were trained and tested on the dataset on two phases to predict the state of different subject at any given time. Our findings indicate that Recurrent Neural Networks achieved an F 1 score of 93% when trained on a selected set of subjects and tested on the data from different subjects. Traditional machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, Extra Trees, and XGB Classifiers, on the other hand, each achieved an F 1 score of 99% when trained and tested on the data for the same set of subjects. Additionally, models performed better on chest data when trained and tested on the same subjects, while they perform better on wrist data when trained on a random group of subjects and tested on the remaining ones.