Effect of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus on the nematode community in a peat meadow soil

The effect of different densities of Lumbricus rubellus on the nematode community was studied in a field experiment. The stand, a cultivated meadow on peat-muck soil developed from moderately decomposed alder peat, was located on drained fens in the central basin of the Biebrza valley in the north-e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of soil biology Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 59 - 62
Main Authors Ilieva-Makulec, Krassimira, Makulec, Grzegorz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Paris Elsevier Masson SAS 2002
Editions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effect of different densities of Lumbricus rubellus on the nematode community was studied in a field experiment. The stand, a cultivated meadow on peat-muck soil developed from moderately decomposed alder peat, was located on drained fens in the central basin of the Biebrza valley in the north-eastern part of Poland. Samples were taken from soil isolators into which 0, 2, 4 or 6 earthworms were previously introduced. The abundance and trophic structure of the nematode fauna in the different treatments were compared 30, 60, 90 and 120 d after the introduction of L. rubellus. The effect of L. rubellus on soil nematodes was most pronounced at the beginning of the experiment. Thirty days after introduction of L. rubellus, the total number of nematodes in all trials with earthworms was significantly lower than in the control, and nematode numbers decreased with increasing L. rubellus density. On later sampling dates, the results were less clear and 120 d after introduction of L. rubellus no significant effect on the total number of nematodes was observed in the treatments. The abundance of the bacterial-, fungal- and plant-feeding nematodes in the treatments with earthworms was lower than in the control 30 d after introduction of L. rubellus, but significant differences were found only in the case of bacterial feeders.
Bibliography:P34
2003003571
ISSN:1164-5563
DOI:10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01126-8