Educational Interventions to Improve Cytology Visual Diagnostic Reasoning Measured by Eye Tracking

• Published in: Journal of veterinary medical education Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 69 - 78
• Main Authors: Warren, Amy L, Donnon, Tyrone L, Wagg, Catherine R, Priest, Heather
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada University of Toronto Press 01.01.2015
• Subjects: Alberta; Clinical Competence; Education, Veterinary; Educational Measurement; Problem-Based Learning; Students, Medical; Thinking; Alberta; clinical pathology; diagnostic reasoning; expertise; eye tracking; teaching and learning
• ISSN: 0748-321X; 1943-7218
• DOI: 10.3138/jvme.0514-056R

The teaching of visual diagnostic reasoning skills, to date, has been conducted in a largely unstructured apprenticeship manner. The purpose of this study was to assess if the introduction of two educational interventions improved the visual diagnostic reasoning skills of novices. These were (1) the active use of key diagnostic features and (2) image repetition. A pre-test and post-test research design was used to compare the two teaching interventions to a traditional teaching group and an expert group using eye tracking as an assessment method. The time to diagnosis and the percentage of time spent viewing an area of diagnostic interest (AOI) were compared using independent t-tests, paired t-tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Diagnostic accuracy as a dichotomous variable was compared using Chi-square tables. Students taught in an active-learning manner with image repetition behaved most like experts, with no significant difference from experts for percentage of time spent in the AOIs and a significantly faster time to diagnosis than experts (p<.017). Our results from the educational interventions suggest a greater level of improvement in the eye tracking of students that were taught key diagnostic features in an active-learning forum and were shown multiple case examples.