Chemical and biological control of Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 in snap bean double-cropped with corn

Fungicides applied to soil or used as seed treatments and biocontrol agents were tested for 3 years in field experiments for efficacy against Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 in snap bean double-cropped with corn. In field plots infested artificially with R. solani AG-4, PCNB was as effective as flutolanil i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop protection Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 121 - 126
Main Authors Sumner, Donald R., Lewis, Jack A., Gitaitis, Ronald D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Guildford Elsevier Ltd 1992
Butterworth Scientific Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fungicides applied to soil or used as seed treatments and biocontrol agents were tested for 3 years in field experiments for efficacy against Rhizoctonia solani AG-4 in snap bean double-cropped with corn. In field plots infested artificially with R. solani AG-4, PCNB was as effective as flutolanil in increasing yield of green pods; however, flutolanil was more effective in reducing population densities of R. solani AG-4 in soil and on roots and in reducing hypocotyl disease. Tolclofos-methyl and mepronil were similar to PCNB in efficacy. The effects of the biocontrol agents Gliocladium virens, Trichoderma hamatum, a binucleate Rhizoctonia CAG-2, and Pseudomonas cepacia were inconsistent, but all showed significant efficacy against R. solani AG-4 in one of the years. However, G. virens, T. hamatum, and CAG-2 all reduced yield in one or more years in artificially or naturally infested soil. Laetisaria arvalis did not control R. solani AG-4.
ISSN:0261-2194
1873-6904
DOI:10.1016/0261-2194(92)90093-K