Performance of Galileo-only dual-frequency absolute positioning using the fully serviceable Galileo constellation

• Published in: GPS solutions Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 1 - 12
• Main Authors: Hadas, Tomasz, Kazmierski, Kamil, Sośnica, Krzysztof
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.10.2019; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Accuracy; Atmospheric Sciences; Automotive Engineering; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Electrical Engineering; Geophysics/Geodesy; Global positioning systems; GPS; Kinematics; Original Article; Root-mean-square errors; Space Exploration and Astronautics; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics; RTS; Positioning; MGEX; Galileo; Real-time
• ISSN: 1080-5370; 1521-1886
• DOI: 10.1007/s10291-019-0900-9

The recent development of the Galileo space segment and the accompanying support of the International GNSS Service (IGS) allows for worldwide Galileo-only positioning. In this study, different techniques of dual-frequency absolute positioning using the fully serviceable Galileo constellation are evaluated for the first time and compared to the performance of GPS positioning. The daily static positioning based on the broadcast ephemeris using Galileo pseudoranges is significantly more accurate than the corresponding GPS solutions, obtaining the accuracy of a few decimeters. In the kinematic mode, the accuracy is better than 10 m and 20 m for the horizontal and vertical components, respectively, which is comparable to that of GPS. Precise absolute positioning using pseudorange and carrier phase Galileo observations combined with IGS Real-Time Service (RTS) or Multi-GNSS Experiment products is not yet as good as the corresponding GPS solutions. In the static mode, the root mean squared error (RMSE) between estimated and reference coordinates does not exceed 0.05 m and 0.06 m for the horizontal and vertical components, respectively. In the kinematic mode, the respective accuracies are better than 0.17 m and 0.21 m. Moreover, we show that both GPS and Galileo pseudorange solutions benefit from the RTS when compared to the broadcast solutions with the improvement in the accuracy between 10 and 59%. Remarkable results are achieved for Galileo Precise Point Positioning (PPP) solutions based on the broadcast ephemeris. In the static mode, the RMSE is 0.07 and 0.10 m for the horizontal and vertical components which is three and two times better, respectively, then the corresponding solutions based on GPS.