Domination problems with no conflicts
Domination problems have been studied in graph theory for decades. In most of them, it is NP-complete to find an optimal solution, while it is easy (and even trivial in some cases) to find a solution in polynomial time, regardless of its size. In recent works, authors added conflicts to classical di...
Saved in:
Published in | Discrete Applied Mathematics Vol. 244; pp. 78 - 88 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
31.07.2018
Elsevier BV Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Domination problems have been studied in graph theory for decades. In most of them, it is NP-complete to find an optimal solution, while it is easy (and even trivial in some cases) to find a solution in polynomial time, regardless of its size.
In recent works, authors added conflicts to classical discrete optimization problems. In this paper, a conflict is a pair of vertices that cannot be both in a solution. Set of conflicts can be viewed as edges of a so called conflict graph. An instance is then a support graph and a conflict graph. With these new constraints, the existence of a solution (dominating set or independent dominating set) with no conflicts is no more guaranteed. We explore this subject and we prove that it is NP-complete to decide the existence of a solution even in very restricted classes of graphs and conflicts (sparse or dense). We also propose polynomial algorithms for some sub-cases, using deterministic finite automata. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0166-218X 1872-6771 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dam.2018.03.018 |