Domination problems with no conflicts

Domination problems have been studied in graph theory for decades. In most of them, it is NP-complete to find an optimal solution, while it is easy (and even trivial in some cases) to find a solution in polynomial time, regardless of its size. In recent works, authors added conflicts to classical di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiscrete Applied Mathematics Vol. 244; pp. 78 - 88
Main Authors Cornet, Alexis, Laforest, Christian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 31.07.2018
Elsevier BV
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Domination problems have been studied in graph theory for decades. In most of them, it is NP-complete to find an optimal solution, while it is easy (and even trivial in some cases) to find a solution in polynomial time, regardless of its size. In recent works, authors added conflicts to classical discrete optimization problems. In this paper, a conflict is a pair of vertices that cannot be both in a solution. Set of conflicts can be viewed as edges of a so called conflict graph. An instance is then a support graph and a conflict graph. With these new constraints, the existence of a solution (dominating set or independent dominating set) with no conflicts is no more guaranteed. We explore this subject and we prove that it is NP-complete to decide the existence of a solution even in very restricted classes of graphs and conflicts (sparse or dense). We also propose polynomial algorithms for some sub-cases, using deterministic finite automata.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0166-218X
1872-6771
DOI:10.1016/j.dam.2018.03.018