Adaptive Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Vehicle Steer-by-Wire under Communication Time Delays

• Published in: Applied system innovation Vol. 7; no. 2; p. 22
• Main Authors: Rsetam, Kamal, Zheng, Yusai, Cao, Zhenwei, Man, Zhihong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.04.2024
• Subjects: Acceleration; Active control; adaptive active disturbance rejection control (AADRC); Adaptive control; adaptive gain; Angular position; Approximation; Automation; Communication; Control algorithms; Controllers; Drive by wire; Error feedback; Estimation; extend state observer (ESO); Feedback control; full state error feedback controller (FSEFBC); Nonlinearity; Parameter uncertainty; Performance evaluation; Rejection; State observers; steer by wire (SBW); Steering; Time lag; Tracking control; Tracking errors; unknown external road disturbance; Wheels
• ISSN: 2571-5577; 2571-5577
• DOI: 10.3390/asi7020022

In this paper, an adaptive active disturbance rejection control is newly designed for precise angular steering position tracking of the uncertain and nonlinear SBW system with time delay communications. The proposed adaptive active disturbance rejection control comprises the following two elements: (1) An adaptive extended state observer and (2) an adaptive state error feedback controller. The adaptive extended state observer with adaptive gains is employed for estimating the unmeasured velocity, acceleration, and compound disturbance which consists of system parameter uncertainties, nonlinearities, exterior disturbances, and time delay in which the observer gains are dynamically adjusted based on the estimation error to enhance estimation performances. Based on the accurate estimations of the adaptive extended state observer, the proposed adaptive full state error feedback controller is equipped with variable gains driven by the tracking error to develop control precision. The integration of the advantages of the adaptive extended state observer and the adaptive full state error feedback controller can improve the dynamic transient and static steady-state effectiveness, respectively. To assess the superior performance of the proposed adaptive active disturbance rejection control, a comparative analysis is conducted between the proposed control scheme and the classical active disturbance rejection control in two different cases. It is worth noting that the active disturbance rejection control serves as a benchmark for evaluating the performance of the proposed control approach. The results from the comparison studies executing two simulated cases validate the superiority of the suggested control, in which estimation, tracking response rate, and steering angle precision are greatly improved by the scheme proposed in this article.