Systemic and personal factors that affect students' elective language other than English enrollment decisions
In a world where English has achieved global dominance, it is unsurprising that the instrumental value of learning a language other than English (LOTE) for those already fluent in English is increasingly deemed unnecessary. There are significant enrollment declines postcompulsory second language (L2...
Saved in:
Published in | Foreign language annals Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 361 - 382 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Alexandria
Wiley
01.06.2022
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In a world where English has achieved global dominance, it is unsurprising that the instrumental value of learning a language other than English (LOTE) for those already fluent in English is increasingly deemed unnecessary. There are significant enrollment declines postcompulsory second language (L2) learning in all English‐speaking countries. To explore the common Australian “monolingual mindset” and students' reasons for (not) enrolling in elective LOTE subjects, a mixed methodology study was conducted with Tasmanian Year 9–12 students. While the findings highlighted the main (de)motivators experienced by students, one key finding was the lost cohort of students who want to study a LOTE but are prevented from doing so by personal and systemic barriers. A complex interplay of factors affects student decision‐making regarding elective LOTE enrollment. This article focuses upon those students who were forced to discontinue their languages study and the untold story of elective LOTE enrollment decline.
The Challenge
Low enrollments in elective LOTE subjects are usually attributed to a lack of interest from students, but is this correct? Are students willingly abandoning LOTE learning, or is an interplay of factors preventing their elective enrollment? This study investigates the systemic and personal barriers experienced by students interested in LOTEs. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0015-718X 1944-9720 |
DOI: | 10.1111/flan.12605 |