Sequential optimal positioning of mobile sensors using mutual information

Source localization, such as detecting a nuclear source in an urban area or ascertaining the origin of a chemical plume, is generally regarded as a well‐documented inverse problem; however, optimally placing sensors to collect data for such problems is a more challenging task. In particular, optimal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistical analysis and data mining Vol. 12; no. 6; pp. 465 - 478
Main Authors Schmidt, Kathleen, Smith, Ralph C., Hite, Jason, Mattingly, John, Azmy, Yousry, Rajan, Deepak, Goldhahn, Ryan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.12.2019
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Source localization, such as detecting a nuclear source in an urban area or ascertaining the origin of a chemical plume, is generally regarded as a well‐documented inverse problem; however, optimally placing sensors to collect data for such problems is a more challenging task. In particular, optimal sensor placement—that is, measurement locations resulting in the least uncertainty in the estimated source parameters—depends on the location of the source, which is typically unknown a priori. Mobile sensors are advantageous because they have the flexibility to adapt to any given source position. While most mobile sensor strategies designate a trajectory for sensor movement, we instead employ mutual information, based on Shannon entropy, to choose the next measurement location from a discrete set of design conditions.
Bibliography:USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
DE‐AC52‐07NA27344; DE‐AC05‐00O; DE‐NA0002576
ISSN:1932-1864
1932-1872
DOI:10.1002/sam.11431