Ten-year employment patterns of patients with first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: comparison of early intervention and standard care services

• Published in: British journal of psychiatry Vol. 217; no. 3; pp. 491 - 497
• Main Authors: Chan, Sherry Kit Wa, Pang, Herbert H., Yan, Kang K., Hui, Christy Lai Ming, Suen, Yi Nam, Chang, Wing Chung, Lee, Edwin Ho Ming, Sham, Pak, Chen, Eric Yu Hai
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2020
• Subjects: Age; Clustering; Community support; Early intervention; Education; Employment; First year; Hong Kong; Humans; Mental disorders; Patients; Psychiatry; Psychosis; Psychotic Disorders; Psychotropic drugs; Reference Standards; Relapse; Schizophrenia; Schizophrenia - therapy; Hong Kong; Hong Kong China; China; Schizophrenia; employment; long-term outcomes; cluster analysis; early intervention
• ISSN: 0007-1250; 1472-1465
• DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2019.161

Little is known about long-term employment outcomes for patients with first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum (FES) disorders who received early intervention services. We compared the 10-year employment trajectory of patients with FES who received early intervention services with those who received standard care. Factors differentiating the employment trajectories were explored. Patients with FES (N = 145) who received early intervention services in Hong Kong between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2002 were matched with those who entered standard care 1 year previously. We used hierarchical clustering analysis to explore the 10-year employment clusters for both groups. We used the mixed model test to compare cluster memberships and piecewise regression analysis to compare the employment trajectories of the two groups. There were significantly more patients who received the early intervention service in the good employment cluster (early intervention: N = 98 [67.6%]; standard care: N = 76 [52.4%]; P = 0.009). In the poor employment cluster, there was a significant difference in the longitudinal pattern between early intervention and standard care for years 1-5 (P < 0.0001). The number of relapses during the first 3 years, months of full-time employment during the first year and years of education were significant in differentiating the clusters of the early intervention group. Results suggest there was an overall long-term benefit of early intervention services on employment. However, the benefit was not sustained for all patients. Personalisation of the duration of the early intervention service with a focus on relapse prevention and early vocational reintegration should be considered for service enhancement.