Application of the Reformulated Gash Analytical Model for Rainfall Interception Loss to Unmanaged High-Density Coniferous Plantations Laden with Dead Branches

• Published in: Forests Vol. 13; no. 5; p. 657
• Main Authors: Jeong, Seonghun, Kume, Tomonori, Shinohara, Yoshinori, Farahnak, Moein, Otsuki, Kyoichi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.05.2022
• Subjects: Branches; Canopies; canopy storage capacity; dead branches; Ecosystems; Forests; Influence; Interception; Interception loss; Mathematical models; Plantations; Planting density; Precipitation; Rain; Rain water; Rainfall; Rainfall interception; reformulated Gash analytical model; stand density; Storage capacity; unmanaged coniferous plantations; Japan
• ISSN: 1999-4907; 1999-4907
• DOI: 10.3390/f13050657

Interception loss (IL) by the forest canopy removes a substantial quantity of rainwater within forested ecosystems. The large-scale unmanaged Japanese coniferous plantations with high stand density (SD) in Japan raise concerns about an additional increasing IL as a result of a new influential factor of dead branches under canopies. Thus, evaluating the usage of IL estimation models is vital to regulating the water and environment in such coniferous plantations. This study aimed to examine the applicability of the reformulated Gash analytical model (RGAM) to unmanaged coniferous plantations with high SD laden with dead branches. We established two plots (P1 and P2) laden with dead branches under the same SD of 2250 stems ha−1 but with different numbers of dead branches (56 vs. 47 branches per tree) in an unmanaged Japanese coniferous plantation. Results demonstrated that a large difference was found in canopy storage capacity (S) in P1 and P2 (3.94 vs. 3.25 mm), which was influenced by the different number of dead branches; therefore, the IL ratio to gross rainfall differed considerably (32.7% in P1 and 26.7% in P2) regardless of the SD being the same. The difference in S enables the RGAM to reflect the influence of dead branch structures on IL, leading to an acceptable RGAM performance for both P1 and P2 (“fair” IL relative errors: −20.2% vs. −16.1%) in the present study of unmanaged coniferous plantations with high SD laden with dead branches.