Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape

• Published in: Ecological entomology Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 78 - 85
• Main Authors: Potts, Simon G., Vulliamy, Betsy, Roberts, Stuart, O'Toole, Chris, Dafni, Amots, Ne'eman, Gidi, Willmer, Pat
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK; Malden, USA Blackwell Science Ltd 01.02.2005; Blackwell Science
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Bees; Biological and medical sciences; community organisation; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hymenoptera; Mediterranean; nesting guilds; resource availability; Synecology; Terrestrial ecosystems; Asia; Israel; Europe; Availability; Nesting; Community structure; Insecta; Apidae; Megachilidae; Social insect; Guild; Animal community; Apoidea; Arthropoda; Hymenoptera; Invertebrata; Food supply; Mediterranean climate; Aculeata
• ISSN: 0307-6946; 1365-2311
• DOI: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00662.x

1. The habitat components determining the structure of bee communities are well known when considering foraging resources; however, there is little data with respect to the role of nesting resources. 2. As a model system this study uses 21 diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape comprising a variety of habitats regenerating after fire. The findings clearly demonstrate that a variety of nesting substrates and nest building materials have key roles in organising the composition of bee communities. 3. The availability of bare ground and potential nesting cavities were the two primary factors influencing the structure of the entire bee community, the composition of guilds, and also the relative abundance of the dominant species. Other nesting resources shown to be important include availability of steep and sloping ground, abundance of plant species providing pithy stems, and the occurrence of pre‐existing burrows. 4. Nesting resource availability and guild structure varied markedly across habitats in different stages of post‐fire regeneration; however, in all cases, nest sites and nesting resources were important determinants of bee community structure.