Chinese Economic History and Development: A Note on the Myers—Huang Exchange
Ramon myers recently reviewed in this journal four books analyzing China's prewar economy and Philip Huang added a reply to some of Myers's criticisms. They clearly disagree about how best to characterize China's Republican-period economy. Myers suggests that books by Loren Brandt, Da...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of Asian studies Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 600 - 611 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, USA
Cambridge University Press
01.08.1992
The Association for Asian Studies, Inc Association for Asian Studies Duke University Press, NC & IL |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ramon myers recently reviewed in this journal four books analyzing China's prewar economy and Philip Huang added a reply to some of Myers's criticisms. They clearly disagree about how best to characterize China's Republican-period economy. Myers suggests that books by Loren Brandt, David Faure, and Thomas Rawski collectively reveal different aspects of modern economic development, while Huang presents the concept of “involutionary growth” as a means of understanding the economic situation. In response, Philip Huang corrects what he takes as misrepresentations of his argument by Myers through a restatement of his major themes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:B16723E00EE5AD568B79891C014683B2F0637BCB ark:/67375/6GQ-RP3TMPB6-9 ArticleID:04171 PII:S0021911800041711 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0021-9118 1752-0401 |
DOI: | 10.2307/2057952 |