Methyl Chloride and Methyl Bromide Production and Consumption in Coastal Antarctic Tundra Soils Subject to Sea Animal Activities
Methyl chloride (CH Cl) and methyl bromide (CH Br) are the predominant carriers of natural chlorine and bromine from the troposphere to the stratosphere, which can catalyze the destruction of stratospheric ozone. Here, penguin colony soils (PCS) and the adjacent tundra soils (i.e., penguin-lacking c...
Saved in:
Published in | Environmental science & technology Vol. 54; no. 20; pp. 13354 - 13363 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Chemical Society
20.10.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Methyl chloride (CH
Cl) and methyl bromide (CH
Br) are the predominant carriers of natural chlorine and bromine from the troposphere to the stratosphere, which can catalyze the destruction of stratospheric ozone. Here, penguin colony soils (PCS) and the adjacent tundra soils (i.e., penguin-lacking colony soils, PLS), seal colony soils (SCS), tundra marsh soils (TMS), and normal upland tundra soils (UTS) in coastal Antarctica were collected and incubated for the first time to confirm that these soils were CH
Cl and CH
Br sources or sinks. Overall, tundra soil acted as a net sink for CH
Cl and CH
Br with potential flux ranges from -18.1 to -2.8 pmol g
d
and -1.32 to -0.24 pmol g
d
, respectively. The deposition of penguin guano or seal excrement into tundra soils facilitated the simultaneous production of CH
Cl and CH
Br and resulted in a smaller sink in PCS, SCS, and PLS. Laboratory-based thermal treatments and anaerobic incubation experiments suggested that the consumption of CH
Cl and CH
Br was predominantly mediated by microbes while the production was abiotic and O
independent. Temperature gradient incubations revealed that increasing soil temperature promoted the consumption of CH
Cl and CH
Br in UTS, suggesting that the regional sink may increase with Antarctic warming, depending on changes in soil moisture and abiotic production rates. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0013-936X 1520-5851 1520-5851 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.est.0c04257 |