Evaluation of the Integrated Multi-SatellitE Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) Product in the São Francisco Basin (Brazil)

• Published in: Water (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 19; p. 2714
• Main Authors: Rodrigues, Daniele Tôrres, Santos e Silva, Cláudio Moisés, dos Reis, Jean Souza, Palharini, Rayana Santos Araujo, Cabral Júnior, Jório Bezerra, da Silva, Helder José Farias, Mutti, Pedro Rodrigues, Bezerra, Bergson Guedes, Gonçalves, Weber Andrade
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.10.2021
• Subjects: Algorithms; Bias; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Drought; Estimates; Gauges; Humid climates; Northeast Brazil; Precipitation; Rain; Rain gauges; Rainfall; Random variables; Regression analysis; remote sensing data; River basins; Rivers; San Francisco River basin; Satellites; semiarid; Statistical analysis; Brazil
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w13192714

The São Francisco River basin is one of the largest in the Brazilian territory. This basin has enormous economic, social and cultural importance for the country. Its water is used for human and animal supply, irrigation and energy production. This basin is located in an area with different climatic characteristics (humid and semiarid) and studies related to precipitation are very important in this region. In this scenario, the objective of this investigation is to present an assessment of rainfall estimated through the Integrated Multi-SatellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) product compared with rain gauges over the São Francisco river basin in Brazil. For that, a period from of 20 years and 18 surface weather stations were used to evaluate the product. Based on different evaluation techniques, the study found that the IMERG is appropriate to represent precipitation over the basin. According to the results, the performance of the IMERG product depends on the location where the rain occurs. The bias ranged from −1.67 to 0.34 mm, the RMSE ranged from 5.36 to 10.36 mm and the values of the correlation coefficients between the daily data from the IMERG and rain gauge ranged from 0.28 to 0.61. The results obtained by Student t-test, density curves and regression analysis, in general, show that the IMERG is able to satisfactorily represent rain gauge data. The exception is the eastern portion of the basin, where the product, on average, underestimates the precipitation (p-value < 0.05) and presents the worst statistical metrics.