Comparison of a Diagnostic Checklist with a Structured Interview for the Assessment of DSM-III-R and ICD-10 Personality Disorders
The International Diagnostic Checklists for the assessment of the DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders (IDCL·P) were compared with a structured interview, the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), using a balanced test-retest design with forty psychiatric inpatients. The resul...
Saved in:
Published in | Psychopathology Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. 312 - 320 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Basel, Switzerland
Karger
1994
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The International Diagnostic Checklists for the assessment of the DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders (IDCL·P) were compared with a structured interview, the International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE), using a balanced test-retest design with forty psychiatric inpatients. The results, using pairwise k for the calculation of agreement, were as follows: any personality disorder versus no personality disorder 0.52 for DSM-III-R diagnoses and 0.75 for ICD-10 diagnoses. The range for the single personality disorders diagnosed at least five times was from ––0.07 to 0.71 for DSM-III-R diagnoses and from 0.38 to 0.68 for ICD-10 diagnoses. Only for DSM-III-R diagnoses do figures exist from three other studies comparing two structured interviews with each other. The results of all four studies suggest that 60% of the variance in personality disorder diagnoses represents variance not attributable to the patients, which is scientifically unacceptable. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0254-4962 1423-033X |
DOI: | 10.1159/000284889 |