Groundwater Potential Mapping Using an Integrated Ensemble of Three Bivariate Statistical Models with Random Forest and Logistic Model Tree Models

• Published in: Water (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 8; p. 1596
• Main Authors: Razavi-Termeh, S. Vahid, Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem, Choi, Soo-Mi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 2019
• Subjects: Algorithms; Altitude; Aquifers; Bivariate analysis; bivariate statistic models; Classification; Climate change; Data mining; data mining models; Drinking water; Flow velocity; Food production; Geology; GIS; Groundwater; Groundwater management; Groundwater potential; groundwater potential mapping (GPM); Groundwater storage; hybrid model; Hydrology; Lithology; Mathematical models; Model accuracy; Population growth; Statistical analysis; Statistical models; Topography; Iran
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w11081596

In the future, groundwater will be the major source of water for agriculture, drinking and food production as a result of global climate change. With increasing population growth, demand for groundwater has increased. Therefore, sustainable groundwater storage management has become a major challenge. This study introduces a new ensemble data mining approach with bivariate statistical models, using FR (frequency ratio), CF (certainty factor), EBF (evidential belief function), RF (random forest) and LMT (logistic model tree) to prepare a groundwater potential map (GPM) for the Booshehr plain. In the first step, 339 wells were chosen and randomly split into two groups with groundwater yields above 11 m3/h. A total of 238 wells (70%) were used for model training, and 101 wells (30%) were used for model validation. Then, 15 effective factors, including topographic and hydrologic factors, were selected for the modeling. The accuracy of the groundwater potential maps was determined using the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve and the AUC (area under the curve). The results show that the AUC obtained using the CF-RF, EBF-RF, FR-RF, CF-LMT, EBF-LMT and FR-LMT methods were 0.927, 0.924, 0.917, 0.906, 0.885 and 0.83, respectively. Therefore, it can be inferred that the ensemble of bivariate statistic and data mining models can improve the effectiveness of the methods in developing a groundwater potential map.