Prediction of unsteady, separated boundary layer over a blunt body for laminar, turbulent, and transitional flow

• Published in: International journal for numerical methods in fluids Vol. 45; no. 12; pp. 1291 - 1315
• Main Authors: Holloway, D. Scott, Walters, D. Keith, Leylek, James H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 30.08.2004; Wiley
• Subjects: Computational methods in fluid dynamics; cylinder-in-crossflow; Exact sciences and technology; Fluid dynamics; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); laminar; Physics; Rotational flow and vorticity; Separated flows; separation; transition; Transition to turbulence; turbulent; Turbulent flows, convection, and heat transfer; unsteady RANS; Boundary layer separation; Computational fluid dynamics; Flow separation; Multigrid; Digital simulation; Blunt body; Circular cylinder; Modelling; Turbulence structure; Crossflow systems; Turbulent laminar transition; Navier-Stokes equations
• ISSN: 0271-2091; 1097-0363
• DOI: 10.1002/fld.739

The focus of this paper is to study the ability of unsteady RANS‐based CFD to predict separation over a blunt body for a wide range of Reynolds numbers particularly the ability to capture laminar‐to‐turbulent transition. A perfect test case to demonstrate this point is the cylinder‐in‐crossflow for which a comparison between experimental results from the open literature and a series of unsteady simulations is made. Reynolds number based on cylinder diameter is varied from 104 to 107 (subcritical through supercritical flow). Two methods are used to account for the turbulence in the simulations: currently available eddy–viscosity models, including standard and realizable forms of the k–ε model; and a newly developed eddy–viscosity model capable of resolving boundary layer transition, which is absolutely necessary for the type and range of flow under consideration. The new model does not require user input or ‘empirical’ fixes to force transition. For the first time in the open literature, three distinct flow regimes and the drag crisis due to the downstream shift of the separation point are predicted using an eddy–viscosity based model with transition effects. Discrepancies between experimental and computational results are discussed, and difficulties for CFD prediction are highlighted. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.