Roads as ecological traps for giant anteaters

Wildlife‐vehicle collisions (WVCs) represent a serious source of mortality for many species, threatening local populations’ persistence while also carrying high economic and human safety costs. Animals may adapt their behaviour to road‐associated threats, but roadside resources can also attract indi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimal conservation Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 182 - 194
Main Authors Noonan, M. J., Ascensão, F., Yogui, D. R., Desbiez, A. L. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Wildlife‐vehicle collisions (WVCs) represent a serious source of mortality for many species, threatening local populations’ persistence while also carrying high economic and human safety costs. Animals may adapt their behaviour to road‐associated threats, but roadside resources can also attract individuals to dangerous roadside habitats, ultimately acting as an ecological trap. Yet, the extent to which individuals modify their behaviour and space use to roads is largely unknown for most taxonomic groups. Using fine‐scale movement data from 38 giant anteaters Myrmecophaga tridactyla tracked in the Brazilian Cerrado, we aimed to identify facets of movement behaviour that might exhibit plasticity to roads and traffic volume. Specifically, the analysis of daily and instantaneous movement speeds, home‐range characteristics and crossing rates/times allowed us to test for an effect of road proximity, traffic volume and natural linear features on movement behaviour. We found no effect of road proximity or traffic volume on space use or movement behaviour. While individuals tended to reduce their movement speed when approaching roads and crossed roads ~3 times less than would have been expected by random chance, none of the three highways we monitored were impervious. The majority of tracked anteaters living near roads (<2 km) crossed them, with higher crossing rates for males than females. Habitat near roads may function as an ecological trap where healthy individuals occupy the territories nearby or bisected by roads but eventually are road‐killed given their regular crossings, leaving the territory vacant for subsequent occupation. Crucially, we found no evidence that anteaters actively searched for passage structures to cross the roads. This suggests that crossing structures alone are unlikely to mitigate WVC‐induced mortality in giant anteaters. Our research reinforces the need to implement fencing, leading to existing passages, and minimizing the amount of night‐time driving to reduce the number of WVCs. Using fine‐scale movement data from 38 giant anteaters Myrmecophaga tridactyla tracked in the Brazilian Cerrado, we aimed to identify facets of movement behaviour that might exhibit plasticity to roads and traffic volume. Our findings suggest that habitat near roads may function as an ecological trap where healthy individuals occupy territories near or bisected by roads but eventually end up as road kill given their regular road crossings and avoidance of crossing structures, leaving the territory vacant for subsequent occupation. Our findings highlight the need for implement fencing that directs animals to existing passages, and minimising the amount of night‐time driving to reduce the number of wildlife‐vehicle collisions.
Bibliography:Editor: Vincenzo Penteriani
Associate Editor: Elissa Cameron
ISSN:1367-9430
1469-1795
DOI:10.1111/acv.12728