A phase III randomized, multicentre, double blind, active controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two different anagrelide formulations in patients with essential thrombocythaemia – the TEAM‐ET 2·0 trial

Summary Anagrelide is an established treatment option for essential thrombocythaemia (ET). A prolonged release formulation was developed with the aim of reducing dosing frequency and improving tolerability, without diminishing efficacy. This multicentre, randomized, double blind, active‐controlled,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of haematology Vol. 185; no. 4; pp. 691 - 700
Main Authors Gisslinger, Heinz, Buxhofer‐Ausch, Veronika, Hodisch, Juri, Radinoff, Atanas, Karyagina, Elena, Kyrcz‐Krzemień, Slawomira, Abdulkadyrov, Kudrat, Gerbutavicius, Rolandas, Melikyan, Anait, Burgstaller, Sonja, Hus, Marek, Kłoczko, Janusz, Yablokova, Vera, Tzvetkov, Nikolay, Całbecka, Malgorzata, Shneyder, Tatyana, Warzocha, Krzysztof, Jurgutis, Mindaugas, Kaplanov, Kamil, Jilma, Bernd, Schoergenhofer, Christian, Klade, Christoph
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2019
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Anagrelide is an established treatment option for essential thrombocythaemia (ET). A prolonged release formulation was developed with the aim of reducing dosing frequency and improving tolerability, without diminishing efficacy. This multicentre, randomized, double blind, active‐controlled, non‐inferiority trial investigated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of anagrelide prolonged release (A‐PR) over a reference product in high‐risk ET patients, either anagrelide‐naïve or ‐experienced. In a 6 to 12‐week titration period the individual dose for the consecutive 4‐week maintenance period was identified. The primary endpoint was the mean platelet count during the maintenance period (3 consecutive measurements, day 0, 14, 28). Of 112 included patients 106 were randomized. The mean screening platelet counts were 822 × 109/l (95% confidence interval (CI) 707–936 × 109/l) and 797 × 109/l (95% CI 708–883 × 109/l) for A‐PR and the reference product, respectively. Both treatments effectively reduced platelet counts, to mean 281 × 109/l for A‐PR (95% CI 254–311) and 305 × 109/l (95% CI 276–337) for the reference product (P < 0·0001, for non‐inferiority). Safety and tolerability were comparable between both drugs. The novel prolonged‐release formulation was equally effective and well tolerated compared to the reference product. A‐PR provides a more convenient dosing schedule and will offer an alternative to licensed immediate‐release anagrelide formulations.
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/bjh.15824