Time factors in breast carcinoma: influence of delay between external irradiation and brachytherapy

From 1971 to 1983, 398 (33 T 1, 309 T 2, 56 T 3) biopsy-proven breast adenocarcinomas were treated conservatively at Hôpital Henri Mondor by an initial course of external irradiation (45 Gy, 25 fractions, 5 weeks) followed by interstitial iridium-192 implant for a further 37 Gy to the tumor. The mea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiotherapy and oncology Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 267 - 272
Main Authors Dubray, B., Mazeron, J.-J., Simon, J.-M., Thames, H.D., Le Péchoux, C., Calitchi, E., Otmezguine, Y., Le Bourgeois, J.P., Pierquin, B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.12.1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:From 1971 to 1983, 398 (33 T 1, 309 T 2, 56 T 3) biopsy-proven breast adenocarcinomas were treated conservatively at Hôpital Henri Mondor by an initial course of external irradiation (45 Gy, 25 fractions, 5 weeks) followed by interstitial iridium-192 implant for a further 37 Gy to the tumor. The mean interval between external irradiation and brachytherapy was 5.9 weeks (S.D. 1.7, range 1–18). Seventy-seven local failures were observed at 10–148 months (median 34.5). The actuarial probabilities (S.E.) of local control at 5 and 10 years were 0.86 (0.02) and 0.74 (0.03), respectively. The follow-up for patients free of local recurrence was 4–205 months (median 95). Multivariate analysis showed an increasing probability of local failure with longer interval between external irradiation and brachytherapy (Relative Risk [R.R.] 1.23 [95% confidence limits: 1.07, 1.41] per week, p = 0.005), and a lower risk of failure in case of complete tumor regression after external irradiation (R.R. 0.47 [0.25, 0.90], p = 0.022), and higher brachytherapy dose rate (R.R. 0.13 [0.02, 1.02] per Gy/h, p = 0.053). No influence of tumor size and total dose (possibly because only limited variations in total dose were observed), or histological grading (not performed in 140 [35%] patients) was found. Because of the lack of dose-control relationship, quantification of the effects of delay between external irradiation and brachytherapy (in terms of compensatory dose) and of dose rate (Incomplete Repair Model) was not possible. The present analysis suggests that the implant dose rate should be high (but no extrapolation can be made above 1 Gy/h) or that total dose should be increased to compensate lower dose rate. However, our data do not indicate how much extra dose is necessary, since no dose-control relationship was elicited. In addition, the treatment duration should remain as short as possible in order to maximize local control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/0167-8140(92)90246-Q