Case Study of an Automatic Enrichment Device for Laying Hens on a Free-Range Laying Hen Farm

Access to adequate foraging material can reduce the occurrence of feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens. Technical devices may help farmers provide enrichment material more effectively. However, research in this field is rare. On a commercial free-range farm with 15,000 laying hens (Lohmann...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAgriculture (Basel) Vol. 9; no. 5; p. 91
Main Authors Schmidt, Melanie, Stracke, Jenny, Kulke, Katja, Kemper, Nicole, Spindler, Birgit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published MDPI AG 01.05.2019
Subjects
animal welfare
cannibalism
feather pecking
foraging
intact beak
maize silage
technical devices
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Access to adequate foraging material can reduce the occurrence of feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens. Technical devices may help farmers provide enrichment material more effectively. However, research in this field is rare. On a commercial free-range farm with 15,000 laying hens (Lohmann Tradition), an enrichment device was evaluated from the 30th to the 58th week of age (LW). It ran at five time points (TP) in the afternoon and offered five grams of dried maize silage per hen per day. The numbers of hens residing in defined scratching areas (ScA) either beneath the device (ScA 1 and 3) or in a similar area without the device (ScA 2) were determined. Significantly more hens were found in ScA 1 and ScA 3 when the device was running. On average, only 6.96 (±7.00) hens stayed in ScA 2, whereas 31.45 (±5.38) and 33.83 (±6.16) hens stayed in ScA 1 and ScA 3, respectively. The hen numbers for ScA 1 and ScA 3 did not differ significantly, nor did the TPs have an influence on number of hens within ScA 1 and ScA 3. The number of hens beneath the device can serve as a potential indicator of the device’s usage.
ISSN:2077-0472
2077-0472
DOI:10.3390/agriculture9050091