Optimization of electro-Fenton/BDD process for decolorization of a model azo dye wastewater by means of response surface methodology

This work discusses the decolorization and degradation of textile azo dye solutions containing Acid Yellow 36 (AY-36) by the electro-Fenton process (EF) using an undivided electrochemical cell containing a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode as cathode for H 2O 2 production. The independent paramete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDesalination Vol. 286; pp. 63 - 68
Main Authors Cruz-González, Karla, Torres-Lopez, Omar, García-León, Azucena M., Brillas, Enric, Hernández-Ramírez, Aracely, Peralta-Hernández, Juan M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.02.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This work discusses the decolorization and degradation of textile azo dye solutions containing Acid Yellow 36 (AY-36) by the electro-Fenton process (EF) using an undivided electrochemical cell containing a boron doped diamond (BDD) electrode as cathode for H 2O 2 production. The independent parameters of current density, dye concentration, Fe 2 + concentration and electrolysis time in the range of 8–23 mA/cm 2, 60–80 mg/L, 0.1–0.3 mM and 10–50 min, respectively, were evaluated. Experimental data were optimized by means of a 2 4 factorial design and Response Surface Methodology (RSM). These results revealed that the optimal operating conditions to achieve 95.9% efficiency for dye decolorization with complete degradation were current density = 15 mA/cm 2, AY-36 concentration = 80 mg/L, Fe 2 + content = 0.3 mM and electrolysis time = 50 min. This was confirmed with UV–vis and HPLC assessments during the EF/BDD treatment. ► Hydrogen peroxide was electrogenerated at BDD cathode. ► The dye Acid Yellow 36 was decolorized by electro-Fenton process. ► Decolorization depended on current density, dye and Fe2 + contents and electrolysis time. ► These variable parameters were optimized by response surface methodology.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.005
ISSN:0011-9164
1873-4464
DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.005