Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Leaders' Influence on Subordinate Creative Performance Across the Creative Process

Using the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership as a framework, 2 primary research questions were examined. First, when engaging in different tasks along the creative process, does leadership style influence the creative performance of subordinates? Second, how does the l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCreativity research journal Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 59 - 74
Main Authors Lovelace, Jeffrey B., Hunter, Samuel T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.2013
Routledge
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Anxiety
College Students
Creative process
Creativity
Ideology
Leaders
Leadership
Leadership Styles
Management styles
Management theory
Multivariate Analysis
Occupational stress
Statistical Analysis
Studies
Supervisor Supervisee Relationship
United States (Northeast)
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Using the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership as a framework, 2 primary research questions were examined. First, when engaging in different tasks along the creative process, does leadership style influence the creative performance of subordinates? Second, how does the level of stress, to which subordinates are exposed, moderate the relationship between leadership style and creative performance? Hypotheses were tested using a laboratory-based design, where 336 participants engaged in 3 unique creative tasks specifically designed to represent the different steps along the creative process. The results indicate that charismatic leaders influence subordinate creative performance above and beyond pragmatic and ideological leaders on middle-stage creative tasks. Moreover, higher levels of stress decreased individual creative performance in terms of ratings of quality, but not originality. Additionally, stress had the least amount of impact on those individuals with a pragmatic leader. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
ISSN:1040-0419
1532-6934
DOI:10.1080/10400419.2013.752228