Incidental Breast Cancer on Chest CT: Is the Radiology Report Enough?

To determine the frequency of incidental breast findings reported on chest CT for which breast imaging follow-up is recommended, the follow-up adherence rate, and the breast malignancy rate. The relationship between strength of recommendation verbiage and follow-up was also explored. A retrospective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of breast imaging Vol. 3; no. 5; p. 591
Main Authors Aripoli, Allison, Beeler, Joley, Clark, Lauren, Walter, Carissa, Inciardi, Marc, Huppe, Ashley, Gatewood, Jason, Irani, Neville, Carroll, Melissa, Norris, Taylor, Barton, Angela, Ackerman, Peyton, Winblad, Onalisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 16.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine the frequency of incidental breast findings reported on chest CT for which breast imaging follow-up is recommended, the follow-up adherence rate, and the breast malignancy rate. The relationship between strength of recommendation verbiage and follow-up was also explored. A retrospective review was conducted of chest CT reports from July 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019, to identify those with recommendation for breast imaging follow-up. Patients with recently diagnosed or prior history of breast malignancy were excluded. Medical records were reviewed to evaluate patient adherence to follow-up, subsequent BI-RADS assessment, and diagnosis (if tissue sampling performed). Adherence was defined as diagnostic breast imaging performed within 6 months of CT recommendation. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine statistical significance of categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A follow-up recommendation for breast imaging was included in chest CT reports of 210 patients; 23% (48/210) returned for follow-up breast imaging. All patients assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 underwent image-guided biopsy. Incidental breast cancer was diagnosed in 15% (7/48) of patients who underwent follow-up breast imaging as a result of a CT report recommendation and 78% (7/9) of patients undergoing biopsy. There was no significant difference in follow-up adherence when comparing report verbiage strength. It is imperative that incidental breast findings detected on chest CT undergo follow-up breast imaging to establish accurate and timely diagnosis of breast malignancy. Outreach to referring providers and patients may have greater impact on the diagnosis of previously unsuspected breast cancer.
ISSN:2631-6129
DOI:10.1093/jbi/wbab040