Enhancing Ultimate Bearing Capacity Prediction of Cohesionless Soils Beneath Shallow Foundations with Grey Box and Hybrid AI Models

This study examines the potential of the soft computing technique, namely, multiple linear regression (MLR), genetic programming (GP), classification and regression trees (CART) and GA-ENN (genetic algorithm-emotional neuron network), to predict the ultimate bearing capacity (UBC) of cohesionless so...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlgorithms Vol. 16; no. 10; p. 456
Main Authors Kiany, Katayoon, Baghbani, Abolfazl, Abuel-Naga, Hossam, Baghbani, Hasan, Arabani, Mahyar, Shalchian, Mohammad Mahdi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.10.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study examines the potential of the soft computing technique, namely, multiple linear regression (MLR), genetic programming (GP), classification and regression trees (CART) and GA-ENN (genetic algorithm-emotional neuron network), to predict the ultimate bearing capacity (UBC) of cohesionless soils beneath shallow foundations. For the first time, two grey-box AI models, GP and CART, and one hybrid AI model, GA-ENN, were used in the literature to predict UBC. The inputs of the model are the width of footing (B), depth of footing (D), footing geometry (ratio of length to width, L/B), unit weight of sand (γd or γ′), and internal friction angle (ϕ). The results of the present model were compared with those obtained via two theoretical approaches and one AI approach reported in the literature. The statistical evaluation of results shows that the presently applied paradigm is better than the theoretical approaches and is competing well for the prediction of qu. This study shows that the developed AI models are a robust model for the qu prediction of shallow foundations on cohesionless soil. Sensitivity analysis was also carried out to determine the effect of each input parameter. The findings showed that the width and depth of the foundation and unit weight of soil (γd or γ′) played the most significant roles, while the internal friction angle and L/B showed less importance in predicting qu.
ISSN:1999-4893
1999-4893
DOI:10.3390/a16100456