The Demoralization Interview: Reliability and validity of a new brief diagnostic measure among medically ill patients

• Published in: General hospital psychiatry Vol. 79; pp. 50 - 59
• Main Authors: Bobevski, Irene, Kissane, David, McKenzie, Dean, Murphy, Genevieve, Perera, Chelsea, Payne, Isobel, Lennon, Jonathon, Michael, Natasha, Grossman, Christopher, Franco, Michael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.11.2022
• Subjects: Adjustment; Coping; Demoralization; Depression; Diagnostic interview; Suicidality; Validation; Validation; Adjustment; Suicidality; Depression; Coping; Demoralization; Diagnostic interview
• ISSN: 0163-8343; 1873-7714
• DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.10.002

Demoralization is a state of low morale and poor coping that is being increasingly recognized in stressful circumstances, such as illness. Meta-analyses show prevalence of 30% in the medically and 50% in the mentally ill. A brief structured diagnostic interview is needed to assess for and diagnose demoralization. The Demoralization Interview (DI) was designed from items of the Demoralization Scale-II (DS-II) and common items used in other clinical interviews. The resultant 26 items were administered to 264 patients with serious progressive medical illnesses, together with the DS-II, measures of depression, anxiety, and quality of life. Rasch analysis was used to co-calibrate the DI against the DS-II. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) were assessed. Concurrent validation was conducted against measures of anxiety, depression, and quality of life. A 14-item Demoralization Interview (DI) with a diagnostic threshold of 6 symptoms generated sensitivity of 78.0%, specificity of 90.9%, and AUROC of 0.84 against the DS-II. Unidimensionality was indicated, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.81. For respondents with 6 or more symptoms on the DI, 98% recognized a current stressor and 66% described significant distress or functional impairment. Demoralized respondents carried significantly lower quality of life, higher physical disability, and higher depressive and anxiety symptoms. The DI has good reliability and validity, with a threshold of 6 symptoms supporting a diagnosis of demoralization. It could be used as a stand-alone diagnosis, or as a specifier for adjustment disorder or depression. •Demoralization is clinically significant and prevalent among the medically ill.•The Demoralization Interview enables clinicians to recognise demoralization.•The Demoralization Interview has good diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.•This interview has utility for clinical practice and improving patients' wellbeing.