Sequential effects in facial attractiveness judgments: Separating perceptual and response biases

When items are presented sequentially, the evaluation of the current item is biased by both the previous item's value (perceptual bias) and the previous response given (response bias). While these biases have been identified in judgements of facial attractiveness, it is unclear as to whether th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVisual cognition Vol. 29; no. 10; pp. 679 - 688
Main Authors Kramer, Robin S. S., Pustelnik, Lyndsay R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Routledge 26.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1350-6285
1464-0716
DOI10.1080/13506285.2021.1995558

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:When items are presented sequentially, the evaluation of the current item is biased by both the previous item's value (perceptual bias) and the previous response given (response bias). While these biases have been identified in judgements of facial attractiveness, it is unclear as to whether they produce assimilation and/or contrast effects. Here, two tasks were employed to measure each bias in isolation. By presenting a preceding face without collecting a response, perceptual biases could be investigated, while response biases were considered by requesting a preceding response without presenting a face. Our results demonstrated a perceptual bias in which attractiveness ratings given to the current face shifted away from the baseline attractiveness value of the previous face, while we found no evidence of a response bias due to the previously selected value. These findings highlight the utility in considering sequential biases separately when trying to determine the nature of these effects.
ISSN:1350-6285
1464-0716
DOI:10.1080/13506285.2021.1995558