Does raising the glucose challenge test threshold impact birthweight in Asian gravidas?
Objective: Some authors suggest a glucose challenge test (GCT) threshold of 150 mg/dL in Asian gravidas. The impact of such a policy on outcomes is unknown. Study Design: A retrospective cohort of 1705 Asian gravidas. Subjects (n=95) had a GCT of 140–150 mg/dL and underwent a 3-h glucose tolerance t...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of perinatal medicine Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 100 - 103 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin
Walter de Gruyter
01.01.2007
New York, NY De Gruyter |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0300-5577 1619-3997 |
DOI | 10.1515/JPM.2007.019 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective: Some authors suggest a glucose challenge test (GCT) threshold of 150 mg/dL in Asian gravidas. The impact of such a policy on outcomes is unknown. Study Design: A retrospective cohort of 1705 Asian gravidas. Subjects (n=95) had a GCT of 140–150 mg/dL and underwent a 3-h glucose tolerance test (GTT). Matched controls (n=190) had a GCT of <140 mg/dL. Birthweight was the primary outcome and the secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery (CD) rate and macrosomia. Results: Eight subjects (11.9%) had gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); none had GTT fasting values of >90 mg/dL. Mean birthweight was 3282 g in the subjects and 3238 g in the controls (P=0.39). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Compared with controls, study patients did not deliver significantly larger infants. However, raising the GCT threshold would have missed 8 subjects (11.9%) with GDM. Raising the GCT threshold to 150 mg/dL in Asian gravidas may unacceptably lower the sensitivity of the screening test. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:2B372F39756811651D8DDB5124BF04E073DA1C38 jpm.2007.019.pdf ark:/67375/QT4-TV91X3D2-H ArticleID:jpme.35.2.100 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0300-5577 1619-3997 |
DOI: | 10.1515/JPM.2007.019 |