Effect of timing of intravenous administration of myelin basic protein on the induction of tolerance in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis

• Published in: Multiple sclerosis Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 2 - 9
• Main Authors: Hilliard, B, Ventura, E S, Rostami, A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Sage Publications Ltd 01.02.1999
• Subjects: Adoptive Transfer; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental - drug therapy; Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental - immunology; Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental - prevention & control; Female; Immune Tolerance - physiology; Immunization; Injections, Intravenous; Myelin Basic Protein - administration & dosage; Myelin Basic Protein - immunology; Myelin Basic Protein - therapeutic use; Peptide Fragments - immunology; Rats; Rats, Inbred Lew
• ISSN: 1352-4585; 1477-0970
• DOI: 10.1191/135245899701564308

Immunological tolerance and suppression of clinical and histological experimental allergic encaphalomyelitis (EAE) can be induced by the intravenous (i.v.) administration of myelin basic protein (MBP). In this report we have characterized the effect of the time of i.v. administration of MBP on the course of EAE in Lewis rats. Rats were treated with the i.v. administration of one or two 500 micrograms doses of MBP either before or after active immunization. Results indicated that i.v. administration of MBP in rats before active immunization with MBP/CFA (naïve rats) was most effective when given 14 days before active immunization, but treatment of rats actively immunized with MBP (immunized rats) was most effective at the onset of disease. Treatment at other times was less effective. The i.v. administration of the peptide MBP 68-88 (p68-88) containing the dominant encephalitogenic epitope could also suppress MBP-induced EAE in a dose dependent manner. Intravenous administration of two injections of p68-88 to naïve rats on days 10 and 3 before, or on days 0 and 7 after, active immunization with MBP suppressed the development of EAE in a dose dependent manner. Treatment of rats with i.v. MBP after, but not before, the transfer of MBP-reactive EAE effector cells suppressed the development of EAE in the recipient rats. Transfer of lymphoid cells from tolerized naïve rats failed to protect recipient rats against development of active or passive EAE. These results indicate the importance of timing and dose of the antigen on the induction of tolerance and suggests different mechanisms of tolerance induction by intravenous MBP in immunized and naïve rats. They also emphasize the importance of timing in designing efficient treatment strategies when i.v. tolerance is contemplated in EAE and possibly multiple sclerosis.