Hybridization between SV40 DNA and cellular DNA's

In DNA-DNA hybridization tests, Simian virus 40 DNA was bound by monkey and mouse cell DNA but not by DNA from chicken livers, Escherichia coli or T4 phage. The capacity of SV40 DNA to bind to monkey cell DNA was not abolished after fractionation of the SV40 † † Abbreviations used: SV40, simian viru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of molecular biology Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 333 - 345
Main Authors Aloni, Yosef, Winocour, Ernest, Sachs, Leo, Torten, Judith
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 14.09.1969
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In DNA-DNA hybridization tests, Simian virus 40 DNA was bound by monkey and mouse cell DNA but not by DNA from chicken livers, Escherichia coli or T4 phage. The capacity of SV40 DNA to bind to monkey cell DNA was not abolished after fractionation of the SV40 † † Abbreviations used: SV40, simian virus 40; MAK, methylated albumin-kieselguhr; F-dUrd, fluorodeoxyuridine; Br-dUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; p.f.u., plaque-forming unit. DNA by MAK chromatography, by equilibrium centrifugation in cesium chloride—ethidium bromide density-gradients, or by band sedimentation in neutral and alkaline cesium chloride solutions. In contrast, polyoma DNA, purified by MAK chromatography, was bound to only a very small extent, if at all, by mouse cell DNA. Double labeling experiments with [ 14C]-Br-dUrd before infection and [ 3H]thymidine after infection showed that the apparent homology between SV40 DNA and monkey cell DNA cannot be accounted for by the presence in viral capsids of host cell DNA unlinked to viral DNA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2836
1089-8638
DOI:10.1016/0022-2836(69)90179-X