Effective reinforcement ratio of RC beams: Validation of modelling assumptions with high‐resolution strain data

Concrete tensile stresses influence the cracking behaviour and the stiffness of reinforced concrete (RC) members. Most design codes account for this tension stiffening effect using an effective reinforcement ratio. Although this ratio has a significant influence on the design of RC structures, its q...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStructural concrete : journal of the FIB Vol. 23; no. 3; pp. 1353 - 1369
Main Authors Galkovski, Tena, Mata‐Falcón, Jaime, Kaufmann, Walter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 01.06.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Concrete tensile stresses influence the cracking behaviour and the stiffness of reinforced concrete (RC) members. Most design codes account for this tension stiffening effect using an effective reinforcement ratio. Although this ratio has a significant influence on the design of RC structures, its quantification is controversial in many cases, and typically relies on empirical geometry‐based expressions. One main reason for this knowledge gap is that the area of concrete in tension can only be verified indirectly, for example, through crack widths and spacings and using a suitable mechanical model. This indirect validation is subject to considerable uncertainty as it depends on parameters that scatter (e.g., bond stresses and the concrete tensile strength), and further assumptions relating internal stresses to the applied loads are required. This article outlines how refined measurements of the reinforcing steel strains and the concrete deformations in the compression zone, combining distributed fibre optic sensing (DFOS) and digital image correlation (DIC), can be used in order to obtain a more reliable quantification of the parameters affecting tension stiffening and hence, the effective reinforcement ratio. Selected models are validated against experimental data of an RC beam tested under four‐point bending, underlining the potential of DFOS and DIC as valuable tools for a better understanding of RC structures and the enhancement of mechanical models.
Bibliography:Discussion on this paper must be submitted within two months of the print publication. The discussion will then be published in print, along with the authors’ closure, if any, approximately nine months after the print publication.
Correction added on 20 April 2022, after first online publication: CSAL funding statement has been added.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1464-4177
1751-7648
DOI:10.1002/suco.202100739