Providing doula support to publicly insured women in central Texas: A financial cost–benefit analysis

• Published in: Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) Vol. 51; no. 1; pp. 63 - 70
• Main Authors: Nehme, Eileen K., Wilson, Kimberly J., McGowan, Robert, Schuessler, Kirkland R., Morse, Sophie M., Patel, Divya A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2024
• Subjects: Black people; Cesarean section; Clinical outcomes; Cost benefit analysis; Doulas; economic evaluation; Ethnicity; Health disparities; Health status; Intervention; Medicaid; Premature birth; public insurance; Race; Women; Womens health; United States > US; Texas; doulas; economic evaluation; cost-benefit analysis; public insurance
• ISSN: 0730-7659; 1523-536X
• DOI: 10.1111/birt.12766

Background Disparities in birth outcomes continue to exist in the United States, particularly for low‐income, publicly insured women. Doula support has been shown to be a cost‐effective intervention in predominantly middle‐to‐upper income White populations, and across all publicly insured women at the state level. This analysis extends previous studies by providing an estimate of benefits that incorporates variations in averted outcomes by race and ethnicity in the context of one region in Texas. The objectives of this study were to determine (1) whether the financial value of benefits provided by doula support exceeds the costs of delivering it; (2) whether the cost–benefit ratio differs by race and ethnicity; and (3) how different doula reimbursement levels affect the cost–benefit results with respect to pregnant people covered by Medicaid in central Texas. Methods We conducted a forward‐looking cost–benefit analysis using secondary data carried out over a short‐term time horizon taking a public payer perspective. We focused on a narrow set of health outcomes (preterm delivery and cesarean delivery) that was relatively straightforward to monetize. The current, usual care state was used as the comparison condition. Results Providing pregnant people covered by Texas Medicaid with access to doulas during their pregnancies was cost‐beneficial (benefit‐to‐cost ratio: 1.15) in the base model, and 65.7% of the time in probabilistic sensitivity analyses covering a feasible range of parameters. The intervention is most cost‐beneficial for Black women. Reimbursing doulas at $869 per client or more yielded costs that were greater than benefits, holding other parameters constant. Conclusions Expanding Medicaid pregnancy‐related coverage to include doula services would be cost‐beneficial and improve health equity in Texas.