Contributions of biomass/solid fuel burning to blood pressure modification in women: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

• Published in: American journal of human biology Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. e23586 - n/a
• Main Authors: Dillon, David T., Webster, Gregory D., Bisesi, Joseph H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2022; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Biomass; Biomass burning; Biomass energy; Blood Pressure; Burning; Cooking; Coronary artery disease; Correlation coefficient; Correlation coefficients; Exposure; Female; Heart diseases; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertension - etiology; Meta-analysis; Respiratory diseases; Smoke - adverse effects; Solid fuels; Systematic review
• ISSN: 1042-0533; 1520-6300
• DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23586

Objectives Approximately 2½ billion people worldwide rely on solid/biomass fuel as fuel for cooking/heating the home. Environmental exposure to the smoke associated with biomass fuel burning has been associated respiratory diseases, cardiac disorders, and altered blood pressure. Therefore, a systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted to study this relationship across multiple studies. Methods Searches were performed using PRISMA guidelines for articles using Web of Science, PubMed, Toxline, and Web of Science of peer reviewed papers with no beginning time restriction until February 2017. The search yielded 10 manuscripts after application of inclusion criteria, which encompassed 93 724 participants. Outcomes included (a) the proportion of people with a clinical diagnosis of hypertension in an exposed (vs. unexposed) population or (b) correlation coefficients examining degree of exposure and systolic/diastolic blood pressure. Results The four studies reporting effect sizes for hypertension (N = 92 042) had a weighted mean effect size of r = .12 [−0.02, 0.27], z = 1.66, p = 0.097. The six studies reporting effect sizes for systolic and diastolic blood pressure (N = 1682) had weighted mean effect sizes of r = .15 [0.06, 0.24], p = 0.001, and r = .09 [0.03, 0.15], p = 0.002, respectively. Conclusion These analyses revealed that there is a small‐but‐significant relationship between biomass fuel exposure and an increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but the relationship between biomass fuel and hypertension specifically remains unclear.