The effects of parental presence on amygdala and mPFC activation during fear conditioning: An exploratory study

• Published in: Developmental science Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. e13505 - n/a
• Main Authors: Abramson, Lior, Callaghan, Bridget L., Silvers, Jennifer A., Choy, Tricia, VanTieghem, Michelle, Vannucci, Anna, Fields, Andrea, Tottenham, Nim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2024
• Subjects: Amygdala; classical conditioning; Conditioned stimulus; Fear conditioning; fear learning; mPFC; Neuroimaging; Parental behavior; parenting; Prefrontal cortex; social buffering; Social discrimination learning; Unconditioned response; Unconditioned stimulus; amygdala; mPFC; classical conditioning; parenting; fear learning; social buffering
• ISSN: 1363-755X; 1467-7687; 1467-7687
• DOI: 10.1111/desc.13505

Learning safe versus dangerous cues is crucial for survival. During development, parents can influence fear learning by buffering their children's stress response and increasing exploration of potentially aversive stimuli. Rodent findings suggest that these behavioral effects are mediated through parental presence modulation of the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Here, we investigated whether similar parental modulation of amygdala and mPFC during fear learning occurs in humans. Using a within‐subjects design, behavioral (final N = 48, 6–17 years, mean = 11.61, SD = 2.84, 60% females/40% males) and neuroimaging data (final N = 39, 6–17 years, mean = 12.03, SD = 2.98, 59% females/41% males) were acquired during a classical fear conditioning task, which included a CS+ followed by an aversive noise (US; 75% reinforcement rate) and a CS−. Conditioning occurred once in physical contact with the participant's parent and once alone (order counterbalanced). Region of interest analyses examined the unconditioned stress response by BOLD activation to the US (vs. implicit baseline) and learning by activation to the CS+ (vs. CS−). Results showed that during US presentation, parental presence reduced the centromedial amygdala activity, suggesting buffering of the unconditioned stress response. In response to learned stimuli, parental presence reduced mPFC activity to the CS+ (relative to the CS−), although this result did not survive multiple comparisons’ correction. These preliminary findings indicate that parents modulate amygdala and mPFC activity during exposure to unconditioned and conditioned fear stimuli, potentially providing insight into the neural mechanisms by which parents act as a social buffer during fear learning. Research Highlights This study used a within‐participant experimental design to investigate how parental presence (vs. absence) affects youth's neural responses in a classical fear conditioning task. Parental presence reduced the youth's centromedial amygdala activation to the unconditioned stimulus (US), suggesting parental buffering of the neural unconditioned response (UR). Parental presence reduced the youth's mPFC activation to a conditioned threat cue (CS+) compared to a safety cue (CS−), suggesting possible parental modulation of fear learning.