Evaluation of Patellar Position before and After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Radiographic and Computed Tomography Findings

Genovarum is a common orthopedic problem. Its optimal prompt treatment is an issue of importance. This study was conducted to determine the radiographic changes in patella bone before and after open wedge high tibial osteotomy. In this quasi-experimental study, 43 patients were enrolled and underwen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedicinski arhiv Vol. 70; no. 4; pp. 293 - 295
Main Authors Moghtadaei, Mehdi, Otoukesh, Babak, Bodduhi, Bahram, Ahmadi, Keyvan, Yeganeh, Ali
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bosnia and Herzegovina Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 27.07.2016
AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Genovarum is a common orthopedic problem. Its optimal prompt treatment is an issue of importance. This study was conducted to determine the radiographic changes in patella bone before and after open wedge high tibial osteotomy. In this quasi-experimental study, 43 patients were enrolled and underwent open wedge high tibial osteotomy and the radiographic and CT-scan indices including Q-Angle, Congruence Angle, Insall-Salvati index, and TTTG were measured and compared before and after surgery. The result revealed that all indices including Q-Angle, Congruence Angle, Insull-Salvati index, and TTTG were not significantly differed across the study (P > 0.05). There was no difference between DLFA values before and after the operation (P> 0.05), while MPTA values were significantly different before and after operation (p <0.001). Totally it may be concluded that imaging indices are not differed after open wedge high tibial osteotomy and monitoring for them is not necessary and they would have no prognostic role.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0350-199X
1986-5961
DOI:10.5455/medarh.2016.70.293-295