A Comparative Exposure Assessment of Campylobacter in Ontario, Canada

To inform source attribution efforts, a comparative exposure assessment was developed to estimate the relative exposure to Campylobacter, the leading bacterial gastrointestinal disease in Canada, for 13 different transmission routes within Ontario, Canada, during the summer. Exposure was quantified...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRisk analysis Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 677 - 715
Main Authors Pintar, Katarina D.M., Thomas, Kate M., Christidis, Tanya, Otten, Ainsley, Nesbitt, Andrea, Marshall, Barbara, Pollari, Frank, Hurst, Matt, Ravel, Andre
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To inform source attribution efforts, a comparative exposure assessment was developed to estimate the relative exposure to Campylobacter, the leading bacterial gastrointestinal disease in Canada, for 13 different transmission routes within Ontario, Canada, during the summer. Exposure was quantified with stochastic models at the population level, which incorporated measures of frequency, quantity ingested, prevalence, and concentration, using data from FoodNet Canada surveillance, the peer‐reviewed and gray literature, other Ontario data, and data that were specifically collected for this study. Models were run with @Risk software using Monte Carlo simulations. The mean number of cells of Campylobacter ingested per Ontarian per day during the summer, ranked from highest to lowest is as follows: household pets, chicken, living on a farm, raw milk, visiting a farm, recreational water, beef, drinking water, pork, vegetables, seafood, petting zoos, and fruits. The study results identify knowledge gaps for some transmission routes, and indicate that some transmission routes for Campylobacter are underestimated in the current literature, such as household pets and raw milk. Many data gaps were identified for future data collection consideration, especially for the concentration of Campylobacter in all transmission routes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-4332
1539-6924
DOI:10.1111/risa.12653