How I investigate minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) is the most important independent prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and refers to the deep level of measurable disease in cases with complete remission by conventional pathologic analysis, especially by cytomorphology. MRD can be detected by multi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of laboratory hematology Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 354 - 363
Main Authors Correia, Rodolfo P., Bento, Laiz C., de Sousa, Flávia A., Barroso, Rodrigo de S., Campregher, Paulo V., Bacal, Nydia S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) is the most important independent prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and refers to the deep level of measurable disease in cases with complete remission by conventional pathologic analysis, especially by cytomorphology. MRD can be detected by multiparametric flow cytometry, molecular approaches such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction for immunoglobulin and T‐cell receptor (IG/TR) gene rearrangements or fusion genes transcript, and high‐throughput sequencing for IG/TR. Despite the proven clinical usefulness in detecting MRD, these methods have differences in sensitivity, specificity, applicability, turnaround time and cost. Knowing and understanding these differences, as well as the principles and limitations of each technology, is essential to laboratory standardization and correct interpretation of MRD results in line with treatment time points, therapeutic settings, and clinical trials. Here, we review the methodological approaches to measure MRD in ALL and discuss the advantages and limitations of the most commonly used techniques.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1751-5521
1751-553X
DOI:10.1111/ijlh.13463