Effects of transitional care interventions on quality of life in people with lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

• Published in: Journal of clinical nursing Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 1976 - 1994
• Main Authors: Liu, Yan‐Yan, Zhao, Yong, Yin, Ying‐Ying, Cao, Hui‐Ping, Lu, Han‐Bing, Li, Ya‐Jie, Xie, Jiao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.05.2024
• Subjects: anxiety; depression; Lung cancer; lung neoplasms; Mental depression; meta‐analysis; Patients; Quality of life; self‐efficacy; symptom; Systematic review; transitional care; anxiety; self‐efficacy; symptom; lung neoplasms; depression; meta‐analysis; quality of life; systematic review; transitional care
• ISSN: 0962-1067; 1365-2702; 1365-2702
• DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17092

Aim To identify and appraise the quality of evidence of transitional care interventions on quality of life in lung cancer patients. Background Quality of life is a strong predictor of survival. The transition from hospital to home is a high‐risk period for patients' readmission and death, which seriously affect their quality of life. Design Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 22 October 2022. The primary outcome was quality of life. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4, results were expressed as standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. This study was complied with PRISMA guidelines and previously registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023429464). Results Fourteen randomized controlled trials were included consisting of a total of 1700 participants, and 12 studies were included in the meta‐analysis. It was found that transitional care interventions significantly improved quality of life (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.40, p = .03) and helped reduce symptoms (SMD = −0.65, 95% CI: −1.13 to −0.18, p = .007) in lung cancer patients, but did not significantly reduce anxiety and depression, and the effect on self‐efficacy was unclear. Conclusions This study shows that transitional care interventions can improve quality of life and reduce symptoms in patients, and that primarily educational interventions based on symptom management theory appeared to be more effective. But, there was no statistically significant effect on anxiety and depression. Relevance to Clinical Practice This study provides references for the application of transitional care interventions in the field of lung cancer care, and encourages nurses and physicians to apply transitional care plans to facilitate patients' safe transition from hospital to home. Patient or Public Contribution No Patient or Public Contribution.