Retention Load of Telescopic Crowns with Different Taper Angles between Cobalt‐Chromium and Polyetheretherketone Made with Three Different Manufacturing Processes Examined by Pull‐Off Test

• Published in: Journal of prosthodontics Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 162 - 168
• Main Authors: Wagner, Christina, Stock, Veronika, Merk, Susanne, Schmidlin, Patrick R., Roos, Malgorzata, Eichberger, Marlis, Stawarczyk, Bogna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2018
• Subjects: Aging; Chromium; Cobalt; Cobalt chrome molybdenum alloy; conus crown; Data processing; Dental crowns; Dentistry; Load; Manufacturing; Regression analysis; Retention; telescopic crown; conus crown; Cobalt chrome molybdenum alloy; telescopic crown
• ISSN: 1059-941X; 1532-849X
• DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12482

Purpose To investigate the retention loads of differently fabricated secondary telescopic polyetheretherketone (PEEK) crowns on cobalt‐chromium primary crowns with different tapers. Materials and Methods Cobalt‐chromium primary crowns with 0°, 1°, and 2° tapers were constructed, milled, and sintered. Corresponding secondary crowns were fabricated by milling, pressing from pellets, and pressing from granules. For these nine test groups, the pull‐off tests of each crown combination were performed 20 times, and the retention loads were measured (Zwick 1445, 50 mm/min). Data were analyzed using linear regression, covariance analysis, mixed models, Kruskal‐Wallis, and Mann‐Whitney U‐test, together with the Benferroni‐Holm correction. Results The mixed models covariance analysis reinforced stable retention load values (p = 0.162) for each single test sequence. There was no interaction between the groups and the separation cycles (p = 0.179). Milled secondary crowns with 0° showed the lowest mean retention load values compared to all tested groups (p = 0.003) followed by those pressed form pellets with 1°. Regarding the different tapers, no effect of manufacturing method on the results was observed within 1° and 2° groups (p = 0.540; p = 0.052); however, among the 0° groups, the milled ones showed significantly the lowest retention load values (p = 0.002). Among the manufacturing methods, both pressed groups showed no impact of taper on the retention load values (p > 0.324 and p > 0.123, respectively), whereas among the milled secondary crowns, the 0° taper showed significantly lower retention load values than the 1° and 2° taper (p < 0.002). Conclusion Based on these results, telescopic crowns made of PEEK seem to show stable retention load values for each test sequence; however, data with thermo‐mechanical aging are still required. In addition, further developments in CAD/CAM manufacturing of PEEK materials for telescopic crowns are warranted, especially for 0°.