Effect of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
What is known and objective We performed a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared to placebo on cardiovascular, kidney‐related, and eye‐related disease outcomes or on mortality in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods A systematic litera...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. 1650 - 1658 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | What is known and objective
We performed a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared to placebo on cardiovascular, kidney‐related, and eye‐related disease outcomes or on mortality in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods
A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was performed, and 8 studies included 61,661 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the start of the study, 29,034 of them were using glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and 32,627 were given a placebo. They reported on relationships between the effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared to placebo on mortality rates, cardiovascular, renal and ophthalmic outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists compared to placebo on the listed outcomes on subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed‐effect model.
Results
The use of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists was associated with significantly lowered all‐cause mortality (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65–0.89, p < 0.001), cardiovascular deaths (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81–0.94, p < 0.001), myocardial infarctions (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85–0.98, p = 0.01), strokes (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–‐0.90, p < 0.001), hospital admissions owing to heart failure (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83–1.00, p = 0.04) and renal events (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77–0.89, p < 0.001) compared to placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists had significantly higher ophthalmic events (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04–1.29, p = 0.009) compared to placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
What is new and conclusion
Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists may have a lower risk of all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospital admission owing to heart failure and renal events compared to placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, they have significantly higher ophthalmic events compared to placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
The effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists on mortality, cardiovascular, kidney, eye outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus are conflicting. The meta‐analysis presented here was to assess this relationship. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0269-4727 1365-2710 1365-2710 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jcpt.13502 |