Patient Retention in a Clinical Trial: A Lesson from the Rofecoxib (VIOXX) Study
A high retention rate of patients and control subjects is an important criterion for the credibility and accuracy of prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials. Retention and adherence depend on a combination of patient-, physician- and coordinator-related factors, and these need to be care...
Saved in:
Published in | Digestive diseases and sciences Vol. 51; no. 7; pp. 1175 - 1178 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Heidelberg
Springer
01.07.2006
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0163-2116 1573-2568 |
DOI | 10.1007/s10620-006-8028-5 |
Cover
Summary: | A high retention rate of patients and control subjects is an important criterion for the credibility and accuracy of prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials. Retention and adherence depend on a combination of patient-, physician- and coordinator-related factors, and these need to be carefully evaluated to ensure success. The aim of the study was to evaluate predictive factors for patient retention in a clinical trial. Questionnaires containing items on demographic and clinical data and specific questions related to patient motivation were distributed to 31 patients participating in a clinical study comparing rofecoxib (Vioxx) and placebo for the prevention of colonic polyp recurrence. Adherence of the group with the rofecoxib study and the questionnaire was 100%. The sample included 24 men (77%) and 7 women of mean age 66+/-9 years; 90% were married, 42% were employed. A family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) was reported by 29%. The main reasons for adherence reported by the patients (on an analog scale of 0-10) were 24-hour availability of a nurse (9.2+/-1.9), the chance to prevent CRC (9.1+/-1.9), and participation in a multicenter study (9.1+/-2.2). The least important factor was support of the family physician (5.8+/-4.1). In conclusion, retention in a clinical trial mainly depends on the subject of the trial and the scientific/professional setting where it takes place, and less on the support of the family physician. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0163-2116 1573-2568 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10620-006-8028-5 |