Impact of Contracted Endodontic Access Cavities on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth After Mechanical Aging by Simulated Chewing Forces

• Published in: Journal of endodontics Vol. 49; no. 9; pp. 1176 - 1182
• Main Authors: Selvakumar, Rene Jochebed, Surendran, Smita, Sundar, Satish, Arul, Buvaneshwari, Natanasabapathy, Velmurugan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2023
• Subjects: Chewing simulation; conservative access cavity; fracture resistance; traditional access cavity; fracture resistance; traditional access cavity; Chewing simulation; conservative access cavity
• ISSN: 0099-2399; 1878-3554; 1878-3554
• DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.06.018

This in vitro study aimed to comparatively evaluate the fracture resistance of contracted endodontic cavities (CECs) versus traditional endodontic cavities (TECs) in mandibular molars after subjecting the samples to a chewing simulator. A total of 24 freshly extracted human mandibular molars were included in the study. Teeth with intact crowns and mature root apices that were devoid of caries, attrition, restorations, and cracks were selected and randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 8) as follows: Group 1: TECs, Group 2: CECs, and Group 3: intact teeth (control group). After endodontic treatment, the teeth were restored with EverX bulk-fill composite and layered occlusally with nanohybrid composite SolareX and subjected to a chewing simulator where 240,000 masticatory cycles were simulated, which translates to 1 year of clinical function. The teeth were then subjected to static loading in a universal testing machine and the maximum load to fracture and the pattern of failure (restorable/unrestorable) were recorded. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons. The CEC group had higher fracture resistance when compared with the TEC group; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The fracture resistance of the samples in the control group was statistically higher than those in the experimental groups (P < .005). There was no difference observed in the fracture resistance of mandibular molars with TECs and CECs subjected to masticatory loading.