Secretome and immune cell attraction analysis of head and neck cancers
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but the response rate is only 13–18%. For an effective antitumor immune response, trafficking of immune cells to the tumor microenvironment (TME) is essential. We aimed to better understa...
Saved in:
Published in | Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII Vol. 73; no. 11; p. 229 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
09.09.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but the response rate is only 13–18%. For an effective antitumor immune response, trafficking of immune cells to the tumor microenvironment (TME) is essential. We aimed to better understand immune cell migration as well as the involved chemokines in HNSCC. A transwell assay was used to study immune cell migration toward TME-conditioned medium. While T cell migration was not observed, conventional dendritic cell (cDC) migration was induced by TME-conditioned media. cDC migration correlated with various proteins in the TME secretome. CCL8, CXCL5, CCL13 and CCL7 were tested in validation experiments and addition of these chemokines induced cDC migration. Using single cell RNA-sequencing, we observed expression of CCL8, CXCL5, CCL13 and CCL7 in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Depleting fibroblasts led to reduced cDC migration. Thus CAFs, while often seen as suppressors of antitumor immunity, play a role in attracting cDCs toward the head and neck cancer TME, which might be crucial for effective antitumor immunity and response to therapies. Indeed, we found RNA expression signatures of the indicated chemokines, cDC and CAF subpopulations, to be significantly higher in baseline tumor specimen of patients with a major pathological response to pre-surgical anti-PD-1 treatment compared to non-responding patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1432-0851 0340-7004 1432-0851 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00262-024-03809-z |