Identification of three novel genetic variations associated with electrocardiographic traits (QRS duration and PR interval) in East Asians

The electrocardiogram has several advantages in detecting cardiac arrhythmia-it is readily available, noninvasive and cost-efficient. Recent genome-wide association studies have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms that are associated with electrocardiogram measures. We performed a genome-wide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman molecular genetics Vol. 23; no. 24; pp. 6659 - 6667
Main Authors Hong, Kyung-Won, Lim, Ji Eun, Kim, Jong Wook, Tabara, Yasuharu, Ueshima, Hirotsugu, Miki, Tetsuro, Matsuda, Fumihiko, Cho, Yoon Shin, Kim, Yeonjung, Oh, Bermseok
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 15.12.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The electrocardiogram has several advantages in detecting cardiac arrhythmia-it is readily available, noninvasive and cost-efficient. Recent genome-wide association studies have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms that are associated with electrocardiogram measures. We performed a genome-wide association study using Korea Association Resource data for the discovery phase (Phase 1, n = 6805) and two consecutive replication studies in Japanese populations (Phase 2, n = 2285; Phase 3, n = 5010) for QRS duration and PR interval. Three novel loci were identified: rs2483280 (PRDM16 locus) and rs335206 (PRDM6 locus) were associated with QRS duration, and rs17026156 (SLC8A1 locus) correlated with PR interval. PRDM16 was recently identified as a causative gene of left ventricular non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy in 1p36 deletion syndrome, which is characterized by heart failure, arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Thus, our finding that a PRDM16 SNP is linked to QRS duration strongly implicates PRDM16 in cardiac function. In addition, C allele of rs17026156 increases PR interval (beta ± SE, 2.39 ± 0.40 ms) and exists far more frequently in East Asians (0.46) than in Europeans and Africans (0.05 and 0.08, respectively).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0964-6906
1460-2083
DOI:10.1093/hmg/ddu374