Center-Center Surgical Technique With Dynamic Syndesmosis Fixation: A Cadaveric Pilot Study

• Published in: The Journal of foot and ankle surgery Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 92 - 96
• Main Authors: Duggan, Shane P., Chong, Alexander CM, Uglem, Timothy P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Ankle Injuries - diagnostic imaging; Ankle Injuries - surgery; Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging; Ankle Joint - surgery; Cadaver; center-center technique; CT scan measurement; Fibula - surgery; fixation; Humans; malreduction; Pilot Projects; Reproducibility of Results; syndesmosis; center-center technique; CT scan measurement; fixation; 5; malreduction; syndesmosis
• ISSN: 1067-2516; 1542-2224; 1542-2224
• DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.09.004

The objective of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to evaluate if the center-center surgical technique is a reliable and repeatable method of achieving proper syndesmotic reduction when using dynamic syndesmotic fixation. Nine fresh frozen above-knee cadaveric lower extremities were used. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were first obtained for each intact specimen as the baseline for comparison. A simulated complete syndesmotic disruption was created by transection of all deltoid and syndesmotic ligaments. Instability of the ankle was confirmed with stress imaging using fluoroscopy. Each unstable specimen was repaired using the center-center surgical technique with dynamic syndesmosis fixation. A series of measurements from the axial CT images of intact and repaired specimens were used to determine the anatomic distal tibiofibular relationships for comparison of changes from intact to postfixation. All radiographic measurements were performed by 4 independent foot and ankle surgeons. The level of inter-rater reliability for all the measurements was found to be “moderate” to “excellent” agreement (ICC value: 0.865-0.983, 95% confidence interval: 0.634-0.996). There was no statistical difference found between rotational alignment of native and postfixation (a/b: p = .843; b-a: p = .125; θ: p = .062). There was a statistical difference detected for lateral alignment at the center of fibularis incisura between native and postfixation (average: −0.6 ± 0.8 mm, range: −2.3 to 1.2 mm, p < .001). There was no statistical difference found for the anteroposterior translation alignment between native and postfixation (d/e: p = .251; f: p = .377). This study demonstrated the use of the center-center surgical technique as a viable and repeatable method for achieving anatomical reduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis when used with dynamic fixation modalities.