Evaluation of an Automated Ultrafiltration System for Concentrating a Range of Viruses from Saline Waters

• Published in: Food and environmental virology Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 422 - 431
• Main Authors: Singh, Simran, Aw, Tiong Gim, Rose, Joan B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.09.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adenoviruses; Animals; Aquariums; Artificial seawater; Automation; Bacteriophages - classification; Bacteriophages - genetics; Bacteriophages - isolation & purification; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Brief Report; Canine distemper; Chemical analysis; Chemistry/Food Science; Coronaviruses; Food Science; Phages; Plaque assay; Recovery; Saline water; Saline Waters; Seawater; Sensitivity analysis; Sewage; Surface water; Ultrafiltration; Ultrafiltration - instrumentation; Ultrafiltration - methods; Virology; Viruses; Viruses - genetics; Viruses - isolation & purification; Water analysis; Water pollution; Water purification; Water sampling; Marine water; Viruses; Droplet digital PCR; Ultrafiltration; Automated bio-concentrator; Environmental monitoring
• ISSN: 1867-0334; 1867-0342; 1867-0342
• DOI: 10.1007/s12560-024-09602-6

Pathogenic viruses in environmental water are usually present in levels too low for direct detection and thus, a concentration step is often required to increase the analytical sensitivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate an automated filtration device, the Innovaprep Concentrating Pipette Select (CP Select) for the rapid concentration of viruses in saline water samples, while considering duration of process and ease of use. Four bacteriophages (MS2, P22, Phi6, and PhiX174) and three animal viruses (adenovirus, coronavirus OC43, and canine distemper virus) were seeded in artificial seawater, aquarium water, and bay water samples, and processed using the CP Select. The recovery efficiencies of viruses were determined either using a plaque assay or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Using plaque assays, the average recovery efficiencies for bacteriophages ranged from 4.84 ± 3.8% to 82.73 ± 27.3%, with highest recovery for P22 phage. The average recovery efficiencies for the CP Select were 39.31 ± 26.6% for adenovirus, 19.04 ± 11.6% for coronavirus OC43, and 19.84 ± 13.6% for canine distemper virus, as determined by ddPCR. Overall, viral genome composition, not the size of the virus, affected the recovery efficiencies for the CP Select. The small sample volume size used for the ultrafilter pipette of the system hinders the use of this method as a primary concentration step for viruses in marine waters. However, the ease of use and rapid processing time of the CP Select are especially beneficial when rapid detection of viruses in highly contaminated water, such as wastewater or sewage-polluted surface water, is needed. Graphical abstract