Laparoscopic Management of Disseminated Peritoneal Leiomyomatosis

• Published in: Journal of minimally invasive gynecology Vol. 30; no. 6; p. 443
• Main Authors: Kriplani, Isha, Kriplani, Alka, Sharma, Seema, Sodhi, Manpreet, Jain, Namita
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.06.2023
• Subjects: Adult; Female; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Lactate Dehydrogenases; Laparoscopy - methods; Leiomyomatosis - diagnostic imaging; Leiomyomatosis - surgery; Myoma - surgery; Uterine Myomectomy - methods; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery; Wandering fibroid; Parasitic myoma; Iatrogenic DPL
• ISSN: 1553-4669
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.03.006

To show laparoscopic management of disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis (DPL). Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. DPL is characterized by dissemination and proliferation of peritoneal and subperitoneal lesions primarily originating from smooth muscle cells [1]. Generally considered benign, cases of malignant transformation to leiomyosarcoma have been reported [2,3]. Iatrogenic DPL occurs because of unconfined morcellation resulting in small fragments of myoma that may implant on any organ and start deriving blood supply from it or may be pulled into port site while withdrawing laparoscopic cannulas [4]. It is estimated that the overall incidence of DPL after laparoscopic uncontained morcellation was 0.12% to 0.95% [5]. Mainstay of treatment is surgical resection of myomas and regular follow-up with imaging. A 28-year-old unmarried girl presented with complain of lump abdomen increasing in size for 1 year. She also complained of a 15 kg weight loss in the last 1 year; 4 years ago, patient had undergone laparoscopic myomectomy with unconfined morcellation for a 10 × 8 cm cervical myoma. Presently her menses were regular with a 28-day cycle and 3 to 4 days' average flow. Magnetic resonance imaging showed multiple nodular lesions of varying sizes in relation to small bowel, colon, uterus, and anterior abdominal wall  suggestive of DPL. Bilateral ovaries were normal. Tumor markers were as follows: CA 125 23.2 (<35) U/mL Carcinoembryonic antigen 1.67 (<8) ng/mL CA 19-9 47 (<37) U/mL Lactate dehydrogenase 809 (180-360) IU/L Alpha-fetoprotein 2.03 (<10) ng/mL Beta human chorionic gonadotropin 1.2(<2) mIU/mL Tru-cut biopsy was done elsewhere to rule out peritoneal carcinomatosis in view of raised CA 19-9 and lactate dehydrogenase, history of weight loss, and imaging showing multiple abdominal masses. Histopathological examination showed leiomyomatosis and immunohistochemistry for smooth muscle actin, desmin, and vimentin were positive. On laparoscopy the abdominal cavity was found studded with multiple leiomyomas of varying sizes deriving blood supply from ilium, transverse, descending and sigmoid colon, rectum, left tube, left ovary, pouch of Douglas, bilateral uterosacrals, uterovesical fold, and anterior abdominal wall. Large blood vessels were seen traversing between the descending and sigmoid colon and the myomas. Principles of surgery were as follows: 1. Complete removal of myomas 2. Cauterization of blood vessels feeding the parasitic myomas to minimize blood loss 3. Disscetion abutting the myoma to prevent injury to adjacent viscera. A total of 26 myomas were removed. All the myomas were retrieved by morcellation in a bag. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of diffuse peritoneal leiomyomatosis. Follow-up ultrasound at 6 months showed no recurrence of leiomyomatosis. Proper mapping of lesions and surgery for complete removal of all masses is the mainstay of treatment. Contained morcellation in bag should be the norm to prevent iatrogenic DPL. Regular follow-up with imaging is required to rule out recurrence.