No Association Between Hospital Volume and Early Second Revision Rate in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Dutch Orthopaedic Register

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 38; no. 12; pp. 2680 - 2684.e1
• Main Authors: van Rensch, Paul J H, Belt, Maartje, Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke, van Hellemondt, Gijs G, Schreurs, Berend Willem, Heesterbeek, Petra J C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.12.2023
• Subjects: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Hospitals; Humans; Orthopedics; Registries; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome; second revision knee arthroplasty; registry; revision total knee arthroplasty; hospital volume; survival
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.082

Revision knee arthroplasty (R-KA) is rising globally. Technical difficulty of R-KA varies from liner exchange to full revision. Centralization has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity rates. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between hospital R-KA volume and overall second revision rate, as well as revision rate for different types of revision. The R -KAs between 2010 and 2020 with available data on the primary KA in the Dutch Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Register were included. Minor revisions were excluded. Implant data and anonymous patient characteristics were obtained from the Dutch Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Register. Survival analyses and competing risk analysis were performed per volume category (≤12, 13 to 24, or ≥25 cases/year) at 1, 3, and 5 years following R-KA. There were 8,072 R-KA cases available. Median follow-up was 3.7 years (range 0 to 13.7 years). There were a total of 1,460 second revisions (18.1%) at the end of follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between second revision rates of the three volume groups. Adjusted hazard ratio for second revision were 0.97 (Confidence Interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.11) for hospitals with 13 to 24 cases/year and 0.94 (CI 0.83 to 1.07) with ≥25 cases/year compared to low volume (≤12 cases/year). Type of revision did not influence second revision rate. Second revision rate of R-KA does not seem to be dependent on hospital volume or type of revision in the Netherlands. Level IV, Observational registry study.