Midterm Survivorship and Patient Satisfaction of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 33; no. 6; pp. 1719 - 1726
• Main Authors: Kleeblad, Laura J., Borus, Todd A., Coon, Thomas M., Dounchis, Jon, Nguyen, Joseph T., Pearle, Andrew D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2018
• Subjects: Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - statistics & numerical data; aseptic loosening; Female; Humans; Knee Joint - surgery; Knee Prosthesis; Male; medial UKA; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data; Prospective Studies; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Robotic Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data; robotic-arm-assisted surgery; satisfaction; survivorship; Tibia - surgery; Treatment Outcome; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; survivorship; medial UKA; satisfaction; robotic-arm-assisted surgery; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; aseptic loosening
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.036

Studies have showed improved accuracy of lower leg alignment, precise component position, and soft-tissue balance with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). No studies, however, have assessed the effect on midterm survivorship. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective, multicenter study was to determine midtem survivorship, modes of failure, and satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial UKA. A total of 473 consecutive patients (528 knees) underwent robotic-arm-assisted medial UKA surgery at 4 separate institutions between March 2009 and December 2011. All patients received a fixed-bearing, metal-backed onlay tibial component. Each patient was contacted at minimum 5-year follow-up and asked a series of questions to determine survival and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survivorship. Data were collected for 384 patients (432 knees) with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years (5.0-7.7). The follow-up rate was 81.2%. In total, 13 revisions were performed, of which 11 knees were converted to total knee arthroplasty and in 2 cases 1 UKA component was revised, resulting in 97% survivorship. The mean time to revision was 2.27 years. The most common failure mode was aseptic loosening (7/13). Fourteen reoperations were reported. Of all unrevised patients, 91% was either very satisfied or satisfied with their knee function. Robotic-arm-assisted medial UKA showed high survivorship and satisfaction at midterm follow-up in this prospective, multicenter study. However, in spite of the robotic technique, early fixation failure remains the primary cause for revision with cemented implants. Comparative studies are necessary to confirm these findings and compare to conventional implanted UKA and total knee arthroplasty.